Is There a Conclusion Here? In order to address the question of how an individual arrives at their sexual being in adulthood, it is important to touch upon the root debate of most of human behavior. The discussion of nature versus nurture.
Nurture The Nature versus Nurture debate concerns the relative importance of an individual's innate qualities versus personal experiences in determining or causing differences in physical and behavioral traits.
Almost everyone in any related field has an opinion as to which is truly more important, nature or nurture. The director of a group called the Minnesota Study of Twins Reared Apart, Thomas Bouchard, believes that 70 percent of a person's personality is genetic and 30 percent is due to environment.
In my opinion, both nature and nurture are very important. Nature and nurture are both influential to language development and emotions. A lot of physical development is pre-programmed to coincide with brain development and is brought about through nature.
Nurture, such as stimulation, is also essential for the brain to develop. Even the cases of identical twins are not a perfect example of nature being superior to nurture. If some of the ties happen to be a coincidence and some happen to be based on vague knowledge of their past, the entire idea is less credible.
For example, the fact that the Jim twins both named their sons James Allen or James Alan could be simply naming the child after themselves. The only way to know for sure is to know more about the context of Nature vs nurture in psychology the things that are similar between the two.
Since we don't know any of it, we can only take it as vague information. Based on all this information, I believe nurture is more important than nature, at a balance of 70 percent of early childhood development being influenced by a person's environment and 30 percent being influenced by genetics.
The two are so tied together that you cannot fully separate one from the other. Nurture has been historically referred to as the care given to children by their parents, in particular the mother. It is now widely regarded as any environmental not genetic factor.
This includes the influences of development arising from prenatal, parental, extended family and peer experiences. It also extends to such influences as media, marketing, and socio-economic status SES.
Additionally, although childhood experience is often regarded as more influential in who one becomes, a broader interpretation might count all life experiences as "nurture.
This means that a large part of the differences between the two have something to do with nurture and the environment they grew up in.
It is often thought that a pair of identical twins raised together may be more different than a pair raised apart. The problem is that there have only been about pairs of twins like these that have ever been studied. This creates a fairly small amount of data to study.
There is a reason that the twins may be more similar if they are raised separately. It is thought that twins raised together may "divide up the territory" and also compete to be different because they are seen as a single unit instead of individuals.
When raised separately, they do not feel the need to make themselves different and do not act unnaturally just to be so. There are several problems with this type of data on twins. If there are birth defects, the twins may be different physically or even mentally. This would change the nature and possibly even nurture of the children, making them more different than regular siblings, which means that even if they are raised apart, they may not be useful to these kinds of studies.
Also, some of the similarities may be more based on similarities between the two families that adopted the two babies. Also, identical twins are not quite as identical as once thought, according to a new DNA study. One twin might get cancer while the other is not susceptible, for example.
The Nature Nurture debate within psychology discusses the extent in which heredity (genetic) and the environment separately affect and influence the individual. Some psychologists argue that nature (heredity) is the most significant and influential on an individual. IDENTICAL STRANGERS Amazing story of triplets separated at birth in chilling nature v nurture social experiment which ended in loss and suicide. A masterful guide to human development that redefines the nature versus nurture debate. A much-needed antidote to genetic determinism, The Dependent Gene reveals how all traits-even characteristics like eye and hair color-are caused by complex interactions between genes and the environment at every stage of biological and psychological development, from the single fertilized egg to full-grown.
Many identical twins clearly behave differently as they grow older, and some even grow to look less alike. Such differences don't have anything to do with the twins' identical DNA, which is like the software of life, but in how genes express themselves.
The differences stem from chemical modifications in the genes over the years. These effects are the result of chemical exposure, dietary habits, and other environmental factors, scientists believe.A masterful guide to human development that redefines the nature versus nurture debate.
A much-needed antidote to genetic determinism, The Dependent Gene reveals how all traits-even characteristics like eye and hair color-are caused by complex interactions between genes and the environment at every stage of biological and psychological development, from the single fertilized egg to full-grown.
IDENTICAL STRANGERS Amazing story of triplets separated at birth in chilling nature v nurture social experiment which ended in loss and suicide. The nature versus nurture debate involves whether human behavior is determined by the environment, either prenatal or during a person's life, or by a person's iridis-photo-restoration.com alliterative expression "nature and nurture" in English has been in use since at least the Elizabethan period and goes back to medieval French.
The combination of the two concepts as complementary is ancient (Greek: ἁπό. Throughout the history of psychology, however, this debate has continued to stir up iridis-photo-restoration.comcs, for example, was a movement heavily influenced by the nativist approach.
Psychologist Francis Galton, a cousin of the naturalist Charles Darwin, coined both the terms nature versus nurture and eugenics and believed that intelligence was the result of genetics.
The nature versus nurture debate is one of the oldest issues in psychology. We explain the question of which is more important: inherited traits or learned behaviors?
A Closer Look at the Nature vs. Nurture Debate. The nature vs. nurture debate within psychology is concerned with the extent to which particular aspects of behavior are a product of either inherited (i.e., genetic) or .